From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,23c85e456e18d6b5 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!203.109.252.33.MISMATCH!newsfeeds.ihug.co.nz!lust.ihug.co.nz!ihug.co.nz!not-for-mail From: Craig Carey Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: The Computer Language Shootout Benchmarks Date: Sat, 06 May 2006 23:00:40 +1200 Organization: Ihug Ltd Message-ID: References: <1262902.DI8C0e8O9o@linux1.krischik.com> <1146595198.437109.277820@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com> <1706825.Rr4F3nhIbP@linux1.krischik.com> <5221419.vt3xd4rotE@linux1.krischik.com> <6q1m52h8kv8ehafq3tbhc5l2r63m48un0v@4ax.com> <1197572.sQlijkcsCu@linux1.krischik.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 203-118-181-113.bliink.ihug.co.nz Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: lust.ihug.co.nz 1146913201 12250 203.118.181.113 (6 May 2006 11:00:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@ihug.co.nz NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 11:00:01 +0000 (UTC) X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.1/32.783 Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:4113 Date: 2006-05-06T23:00:40+12:00 List-Id: On Fri, 05 May 2006 20:15:18 +0200, Martin Krischik wrote: >Craig Carey wrote: I wrote to Mr Isaac Gouy since he owns half of the shootout.alioth.debian.org website. The site seems to contain two sites of two persons, and Mr Gouy's "Intel P4" part of the website could not have the 53% adjustment since got compares the speeds of computer lanugages using 'seconds of time'. >> On Thu, 04 May 2006 18:48:04 +0200, Martin Krischik wrote: >>>Martin Krischik wrote: ... >I am not promoting them. ...Grouping together two leader/webmasters that apparently can't agree on the most convincing way to process timing figures ?. A Haskell Usenet group noticed that there had been bias at that website. ... >> could be fraudulent >> throughtout and uncompromisingly secretively adjusted by 53% [to favour C]. ... >> Oh, so you have not been falsifying data in e-mails to comp.lang.ada >> yet ?. What could be worse about GNAT than slow speeds ...? > >Of co[u]rse not. Why should I? I am not retracting my suggestion because the falsification seems real; Ada is not defended, C is not defended, you produced a bunch of timing figures again ... which causes readers to wonder just how big a pro-C bias has to get before your aim of tweaking GNAT Ada 95 code collapses?. Could it be 2005% ? ... and Leroy said that there is no shortage of ideas in ARG. Here's is Mr Isaasc Gouy's e-mail address since it really looks like comp.lang.ada lacks ideas. Isaac Gouy Apologies for this, but I ask Mr Krischik to disclose the date when he typed something into a Debian distr console. Craig Carey