From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on ip-172-31-65-14.ec2.internal X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,NICE_REPLY_A autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "J-P. Rosen" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Aspect location in expression function. Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 12:01:08 +0200 Organization: Adalog Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 10:01:08 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="c1fb8460b4a1dfa88e5e892872e3df47"; logging-data="2243"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/AmYQgYVbCG/ue+3ebm5GS" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.9.1 Cancel-Lock: sha1:bXJmdxQqW6/BGBME0lBFGiZeAmA= In-Reply-To: Content-Language: fr Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:63874 List-Id: Le 24/05/2022 à 06:05, Randy Brukardt a écrit : > To make a functioning :LR grammar for Ada, I*had* to allow the aspect > specification in both places, and then make one of them illegal. Which is > more work than just allowing in either place. So I guess it is a matter of > perspective.:-) But if you allow it in either place, then you have to decide what happens if it appears in /both/ places... Would you like conformance checking? I bet no ;-) -- J-P. Rosen Adalog 2 rue du Docteur Lombard, 92441 Issy-les-Moulineaux CEDEX Tel: +33 1 45 29 21 52 https://www.adalog.fr