From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,f26a27628ab2a2fe
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Received: by 10.68.218.166 with SMTP id ph6mr4930724pbc.5.1330245386861;
        Sun, 26 Feb 2012 00:36:26 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 h9ni10637pbe.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!feeder.erje.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: help building ada with glade
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 09:36:25 +0100
Organization: cbb software GmbH
Message-ID: <t4eznzhprcmb.162r5ao284zlt.dlg@40tude.net>
References: 
 <66ce64dd-1428-4db1-8d0e-a4ba68f9f09d@e27g2000vbu.googlegroups.com>
 <t4dxgi068wxi$.asa8tzvc65eq$.dlg@40tude.net> <ji78ll$rj$1@dont-email.me>
 <1dfmw0tj24ol0.pdfi51pextgu$.dlg@40tude.net> <ji95g5$g2n$1@dont-email.me>
 <1rlxflx3vn7d2$.gwfur2yxe3we.dlg@40tude.net> <jicl03$ce3$1@dont-email.me>
Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de
NNTP-Posting-Host: kuQH/mT1psJwQvBx6E6CEw.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Date: 2012-02-26T09:36:25+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 07:55:00 +0100, J-P. Rosen wrote:

> Le 25/02/2012 10:06, Dmitry A. Kazakov a �crit :

>> Not much different from MS GUI builder, which I long ago ceased to use for
>> same reasons I never used GLADE. One lesson was enough.
> So, you didn't use it, but you know it's bad?

Because I know: 1) GTK/GtkAda, 2) MS and Open/Look GUI builders. 

>> But it is impossible to do due to GTK design [**]. [..]
>> I presume that GLADE rather uses strictly static forms [...]
> 
> You didn't use it, but you think it's impossible.

Yes.

> Once again, you are free to explain to the OP how /you/ use GTK. But
> please don't give advice to not use something that you didn't try yourself.

My post considered learning GTK/GtkAda. I listed things essential for
understanding GTK. Maybe GLADE is terrific, as you said, for casual GUIs.
But you didn't say that GLADE is good for either learning GTK or for
designing less casual GUIs.

-- 
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de