From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,fc52c633190162e0 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news.germany.com!newsfeed.utanet.at!newsfeed01.chello.at!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool2.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" Subject: Re: why learn C? Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de Organization: cbb software GmbH References: <1172144043.746296.44680@m58g2000cwm.googlegroups.com> <1172161751.573558.24140@h3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> <546qkhF1tr7dtU1@mid.individual.net> <5ZULh.48$YL5.40@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net> <1175215906.645110.217810@e65g2000hsc.googlegroups.com> <1175230700.925143.28490@n59g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> <6XbPh.4025$u03.802@newssvr21.news.prodigy.net> <1175491660.511530.58430@y80g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> <1175566924.442636.199470@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> <1reb6r7o5dbxg$.jd6d0xjy6146$.dlg@40tude.net> <1176411242.5632.33.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1xmqt5mhqm6x1.xqkti6xl4ps2$.dlg@40tude.net> <1176414046.5632.61.camel@localhost.localdomain> Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 22:50:36 +0200 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Date: 12 Apr 2007 22:49:46 CEST NNTP-Posting-Host: 92d386c6.newsspool4.arcor-online.net X-Trace: DXC=]?6bSIHIMJYPU8j_I0DN6_4IUK On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 23:40:47 +0200, Georg Bauhaus wrote: > On Thu, 2007-04-12 at 22:33 +0200, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: >> I can build hardware for floating-point >>>> numbers with the radix e. >>> >>> Will radix e hardware be digital hardware? >> >> Why not? It is just about representation of numbers in the form >> >> X = sum Xk e**k >> >> That's computable. > > Hm. Are you saying that e is computable using digital hardware > in finite time? Sure. Here it is: e. The question is meaningless without specifying the language. In my language e is computable, but 10 is probably not. > Or that we interpret some discrete unit in the computer as > a base named e? Yes. Some computer states are associated with the variable x having the value e. That is. It is no different from associating them x=0 or x=1. Computer states are not numbers. We, humans, interpret them as numbers. -- Regards, Dmitry A. Kazakov http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de