From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,b49d3a703a4b4db5
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!micro-heart-of-gold.mit.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!npeer.de.kpn-eurorings.net!npeer-ng0.de.kpn-eurorings.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool3.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Subject: Re: compiler settings in AdaGIDE
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de
Organization: cbb software GmbH
References: 
 <c072b766-9241-4580-9447-4adeb6ed0573@x21g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>
  <e715e179-6053-4190-94d4-6a348f9ea635@q22g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>
 <02d1f899-ad8f-493b-8f64-3791868a1bdb@q35g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>
 <i2i3to$asf$1@tornado.tornevall.net>
 <43960a8a-334f-4192-8efe-9e8261010789@w31g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>
 <7fbf1431-3e0a-4cf1-954f-fb81ccc6c44d@y11g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 19:12:03 +0200
Message-ID: <t1rur5d9de5q$.tpylvsft9cvp.dlg@40tude.net>
NNTP-Posting-Date: 26 Jul 2010 19:12:03 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: 63b1859e.newsspool4.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=?KUhBB6\oKd]BlmkiiU@Bi4IUK<Cl32<a4Fo<]lROoRa8kF<OcfhCOkN=@_MEMZYUo[6LHn;2LCVn[<mhadbfdUkM7I50]8=2XihNCgYKMJ0Dm
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:12586
Date: 2010-07-26T19:12:03+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 08:48:58 -0700 (PDT), sjw wrote:

> On Jul 26, 3:13�pm, Ada novice <po...@gmx.us> wrote:
>> On Jul 25, 9:30 pm, "Jeffrey R. Carter"
>>
>> <spam.jrcarter....@spam.acm.org> wrote:
>>> On 07/25/2010 06:29 AM, Ada novice wrote:
>>> > 1. I see that you use -gnatnp. Is this safe to do so i.e. to suppress
>>> > all checks?
>>> No, but it is a little faster. You asked about maximizing speed, not about
>>> safety. Of course, none of this is going to make a significant difference, as
>>> you found out yourself. Significant speed changes come about from improved
>>> algorithms. The correct approach is to implement correctly, clearly, and safely,
>>> then measure against your timing requirements (which are unspecified), and only
>>> make changes if the result fails to meet the timing requirements.
>>
>> Thanks. I understand. I would prefer to keep the -gnatn just to be
>> safe.
> 
> -gnatp to suppress checks. -gnatn is about inlining.

The gentleman's set is:

debug

-gnatVa  all validity checks on
-gnatf  show all errors messages
-gnato  integer overflow check
-g  add debug info
-fstack-check  check stack overflow

release

-gnatVa
-gnatf
-gnato
-O2  medium level optimization
-gnatn  inline as defined by the user

-- 
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de