From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,1efdd369be089610 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,1d8ab55e71d08f3d X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public From: thomas@gnu.ai.mit.edu (Thomas Bushnell, n/BSG) Subject: Re: what DOES the GPL really say? Date: 1997/06/26 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 252801534 References: <33B014E3.3343@no.such.com> <5oqp9s$7vj$1@news.nyu.edu> <33B13BF6.79C7@no.such.com> <33B2ABA6.2A44C487@link.com> Organization: Free Software Foundation, Cambridge, MA Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,gnu.misc.discuss Date: 1997-06-26T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Samuel Mize writes: > However, company decisions are constraints on what we engineers > can do. I can't change the brand of computer we use; I can't > write Lisp or Forth code for our systems; I can't incorporate > GPL'd code. At least, I can't do so and still be doing the job > they're paying me to do. What you mean is "I choose not to incorporate GPL'd code into my work so that I can make more money". This might be a rational choice; but it is a choice, not anything forced upon you.