From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,92a027c293f03acb X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!wns13feed!worldnet.att.net!attbi_s22.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail From: "Jeffrey R. Carter" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (Windows/20070509) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Workqueues in Ada References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.201.97.213 X-Complaints-To: abuse@mchsi.com X-Trace: attbi_s22 1185690840 12.201.97.213 (Sun, 29 Jul 2007 06:34:00 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 06:34:00 GMT Organization: AT&T ASP.att.net Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 06:34:00 GMT Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:1256 Date: 2007-07-29T06:34:00+00:00 List-Id: Robert A Duff wrote: > > What about it, Jeff? Do you plan to update your components to be Ada > 2005 compatible? Once we have multiple compilers available, I will probably look into that. Some of the functionality is now duplicated in the standard library, and I may revise the data structure components to be more like Ada.Containers, and base the unbounded structures on Ada.Containers.Doubly_Linked_List. > Note that in Ada 95, the above "return" has some rather strange > behavior in some cases. Still, the fact that it was legal Ada, and is > now illegal, is rather annoying. Indeed. -- Jeff Carter "C's solution to this [variable-sized array parameters] has real problems, and people who are complaining about safety definitely have a point." Dennis Ritchie 25