From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,7a992ba0c2391839 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: swhalen@netcom.com (Steve Whalen) Subject: Re: Active Iteration - Update Date: 1998/05/17 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 353960667 Sender: swhalen@netcom4.netcom.com References: Organization: ? Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1998-05-17T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Thanks for posting the updated and improved Iterator package. Studying it has encouraged me to once more go back over old code I've written that works, but isn't "elegant". My experience is that if code I write isn't clear and at least somewhat elegant, then I probably have NOT taken enough time to match either the data or the algorithms to my Ada95 implementation. I think your iterator package is a good example that if you keep pushing to find a "clean" solution in Ada, the language will almost always support it. Steve -- {===----------------------------------------------------------------------===} Steve Whalen swhalen@netcom.com {===----------------------------------------------------------------------===}