From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,ed16b323e88cf5a3 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-03-11 04:05:16 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!hammer.uoregon.edu!enews.sgi.com!paloalto-snf1.gtei.net!mtvwca1-snh1.ops.genuity.net!chcgil2-snh1.gtei.net!chcgil2-snf1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!news.binc.net!kilgallen From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: UniParser 0.1 released. Date: 11 Mar 2003 06:05:13 -0600 Organization: LJK Software Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: eisner.encompasserve.org X-Trace: grandcanyon.binc.net 1047384280 18645 192.135.80.34 (11 Mar 2003 12:04:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@binc.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 12:04:40 +0000 (UTC) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:35180 Date: 2003-03-11T06:05:13-06:00 List-Id: In article , Preben Randhol writes: > Larry Kilgallen wrote: >> Security policies that forbid copying software over the Internet. > > But how do you know that the content on the CD is not a security risk? The point I raised was whether a prospective vendor is capable of dealing with an existing security policy. It was not an effort to redesign that policy. There may be other aspects of the policy of which you are not aware.