From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,72c9169f71f6d2e7
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: smcneil@netcom.com (Sean McNeil)
Subject: Re: s-arit64.adb was Re: GNAT 2.04 compilation problem under Linux
Date: 1995/04/07
Message-ID: <smcneilD6oHIK.3Iq@netcom.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 100070402
sender: smcneil@netcom20.netcom.com
references: <smcneilD6nGz7.EpF@netcom.com> <3m3qn3INNpc3@ra.dept.cs.yale.edu>
organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest)
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1995-04-07T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <3m3qn3INNpc3@ra.dept.cs.yale.edu>,
Tom Griest <griest-tom@cs.yale.edu> wrote:
>  This is a recently discovered problem with the most recent release
>of GNAT-2.04 on x86 architectures.  (It shows up on others besides
>Linux.)  The folks at NYU are aware of the issue, and are working
>on a solution.  Still, you should always CC: gnat-report@cs.nyu.edu
>on a problem like this.
>
>-Tom


Thanks Tom (and others) that have responded.  Just because I sent this
message to cla does not mean that I bypassed gnat-report@cs.nyu.edu.
I in fact did send a report, but made a shorter version for USENET
(not wanting to eat up bandwidth).  Another reason I posted was
because cs.nyu.edu was down last night for some reason (or my internet
feed via. netcom was down).

I just wanted to let everyone know that I CAN read directions :)

Sean McNeil