From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Natasha Kerensikova Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Access parameters and accessibility Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 09:06:15 +0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: Injection-Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 09:06:15 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="76a49b86bc3e16725b7cfca3d85cb4c8"; logging-data="17190"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19dMwYmQeUFoB3J83By4LAW" User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (FreeBSD) Cancel-Lock: sha1:lRehgfkXoYivoEy3wCABL3FF6kI= Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:24066 Date: 2014-12-17T09:06:15+00:00 List-Id: On 2014-12-17, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: > On Wed, 17 Dec 2014 07:02:56 +0000 (UTC), Natasha Kerensikova wrote: > >> Now you got me really worried, because I thouhgt access discriminants >> were safe. It was under that assumption that I actually started to >> really like them. >> >> More specifically, the pattern I caught myself using a lot looks like >> the following: >> >> type Preprocessed_Data (Input_Data : access Input_Data_Type) is record > > not null access? I tought access discriminants were not allowed to be null. Has that changed? Or do you advise "not null access" to make it explicit? Natasha