From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Natasha Kerensikova <lithiumcat@instinctive.eu>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Access parameters and accessibility
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 09:08:40 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <slrnm8vtl1.nrc.lithiumcat@nat.rebma.instinctive.eu>
References: <m6n3kr$t51$1@speranza.aioe.org> <m6onu3$6or$1@loke.gir.dk>
Injection-Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 09:08:40 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="76a49b86bc3e16725b7cfca3d85cb4c8";
	logging-data="18039"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18ehB1YUox+p75i4SF3wP2S"
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (FreeBSD)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:gChkeJUv4fHmw7yMMzXs7cfG8P8=
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:24037
Date: 2014-12-16T09:08:40+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 2014-12-16, Randy Brukardt <randy@rrsoftware.com> wrote:
> Anonymous access parameters: just say no!!

I still believe a case could be made for anonymous access to subprogram
parameters.

Generics and interfaces could of course be used instead of them, but I
feel they are often more cumbersome to use.


Natasha