From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: border1.nntp.dca3.giganews.com!backlog3.nntp.dca3.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.bbs-scene.org!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Natasha Kerensikova Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada platforms and pricing, was: Re: a new language, designed for safety ! Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 07:03:24 +0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: <1402308235.2520.153.camel@pascal.home.net> <85ioo9yukk.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <255b51cd-b23f-4413-805a-9fea3c70d8b2@googlegroups.com> <5ebe316d-cd84-40fb-a983-9f953f205fef@googlegroups.com> <2100734262424129975.133931laguest-archeia.com@nntp.aioe.org> <857442918424729589.090275laguest-archeia.com@nntp.aioe.org> <0eSdnZQ1fO9LTzzORVn_vwA@giganews.com> Injection-Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 07:03:24 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org; posting-host="76a49b86bc3e16725b7cfca3d85cb4c8"; logging-data="2426"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX185VDSZhMUTX5Mu4utKEWto" User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (FreeBSD) Cancel-Lock: sha1:Y8y1d+OVMa7RuTDea40u8er0stw= X-Original-Bytes: 3089 Xref: number.nntp.dca.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:187083 Date: 2014-06-20T07:03:24+00:00 List-Id: On 2014-06-19, Peter Chapin wrote: > Actually a "strategic" goal of my project is to make people from both > communities aware of each other. While the Ada people here tend to say, > "why would you want to use [insert name of some non-Ada language] for > anything?" I find myself thinking more and more often in those terms (except always at the first person, I'm not claiming anything for anybody else), a bit to my surprise. It's just that Ada is so good in its explicitness, readability, maintainability and reliability that I find myself reluctant to give up such comfort. (And I fully agree that Ada is far from perfect, it's just much more comfortable to use than all the other languages I've come across.) > I'm about 100% sure the Scala people on the other side would > say, "Ada? Huh...?" However, in my view both are fine languages, each in > its own way, and it would be cool to bring the communities together even > if only in some small manner. We'll see how it goes, at least it can't hurt :-) > In any case, I certainly am not claiming that my project will provide > any useful degree of compiler diversity... at least not in the > foreseeable future. Well, I'm not claiming mine will either, I just foolishly hope it will. Natasha