From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,38d01316d66d8f95
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.135.231 with SMTP id pv7mr3865733pbb.8.1331174334010;
        Wed, 07 Mar 2012 18:38:54 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 h9ni354pbe.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!newsfeed1.swip.net!85.214.198.2.MISMATCH!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Eilie <Eilie@what-are-you-looking.for>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada and linux real time
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 02:38:53 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <slrnjlg6tv.mv.Eilie@localhost.localdomain>
References: 
 <a2bcd552-9765-487a-a054-6fa48be18b95@y10g2000vbn.googlegroups.com>
 <8kb66jddm0qb.1piup0wfaho1$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <3a01f684-b544-4051-985d-58aab98e832c@v2g2000vbx.googlegroups.com>
 <13z45jd9irz9x.1j2hj7ayxwkyj.dlg@40tude.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Injection-Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 02:38:53 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="Djv7k0en5Qxna71K2VR8XQ";
	logging-data="26474"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX199nwoLEoF4oD/Vf61nqWlD"
User-Agent: slrn/0.9.9p1 (Linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:kokuZlcluN67WyPZFJ+EK1WF8gw=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: 2012-03-08T02:38:53+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 2012-03-07, Dmitry A. Kazakov <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Mar 2012 04:10:14 -0800 (PST), slos wrote:
>
> I cannot tell for Linux, because I didn't use it for real-time purposes
> yet. Ideally it should derive the system time from the TSC. However
> scheduling would likely limited when controlled by timer interrupts. The
> minimal waiting time is then determined by the timer's period. You should
> look for this kernel setting if you want go below 10ms, or what the actual
> limit is.
>

And what OS do you use for real-time purposes?