From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,1b97e35c9fc766ce X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Received: by 10.204.145.80 with SMTP id c16mr121918bkv.2.1326349537440; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 22:25:37 -0800 (PST) Path: cj8ni87197bkb.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!goblin3!goblin.stu.neva.ru!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: usenet@postinghost.com Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: ee9 V1.9: Ada 2005 emulator of the KDF9 Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 06:22:53 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Message-ID: References: <4f0dd67b$0$282$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> NNTP-Posting-Host: LvTXUzu20qoVoLqCjlacbw.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: 2012-01-12T06:22:53+00:00 List-Id: On 2012-01-11, Thomas L�cke wrote: > On 01/11/2012 04:45 PM, usenet@postinghost.com wrote: >> I'd be glad to help with SPARC builds but I don't have anything newer than >> 3.15p and until I can learn to build gcc-Ada myself I'm a bit stuck since I >> prefer not to use other peoples packages although if AdaCore would host a >> package and stand behind it I would give it a shot. >> > > > https://plus.google.com/101553438503824697034/posts/GeyHU1xqTb1 > http://ada-dk.org/2011/12/solaris-gnat-packages/ > > OpenCSW effort to get FSF GCC GNAT on Solaris. I'm pretty sure Maciej > Blizi??ski did a sparc build also. > Thanks for the links. There are a few package sites for Solaris but they seem to require you install their tools and many prereqs to use their packages. I don't use gcc when I can avoid it (on Solaris that is 99% of the time) and I haven't had a desire to start using it except that I can't get gcc-Ada without it. I'll see about getting some help building gcc-Ada rather than using someone else's packages and maybe we'll be able to come up with a more flexible installation that uses standard paths, that is always a challenge on Solaris. >