From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,73175d2d01a1b1dd
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.8.229 with SMTP id u5mr21620201pba.0.1317029717294;
        Mon, 26 Sep 2011 02:35:17 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 lh7ni5208pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!goblin3!goblin.stu.neva.ru!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder2.enfer-du-nord.net!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Natasha Kerensikova <lithiumcat@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: subprogram must not be deeper than access type
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 09:35:16 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <slrnj80hqk.i18.lithiumcat@sigil.instinctive.eu>
References: <slrnj7trhq.i18.lithiumcat@sigil.instinctive.eu>
 <20110925160442.399884a0@c-01b>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Injection-Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 09:35:16 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="Mda950WjNwNLAFOE7yJXQw";
	logging-data="18904"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX187rPyitbjjQsGwjKI3JU9p"
User-Agent: slrn/0.9.9p1 (FreeBSD)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:+htpxltuJa5BKHAzMk1sKFChbb8=
Xref: news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:18125
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: 2011-09-26T09:35:16+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Hello,

On 2011-09-25, Oliver Kleinke <oliver.kleinke@c-01a.de> wrote:
> I am unsure but you might want to try it using an anonymous access to
> subprogram type, as described here
> ('05 Rationale, 3.4 - Downward Closures)
> http://www.adaic.org/resources/add_content/standards/05rat/html/Rat-3-4.html

Yes, anonymous access solved my problem, thanks a lot for the pointer.

And also, thanks a lot for making me read the rationale. While I did
know it existed, I thought it was on the same level of understandability
as the Reference Manual, so it didn't occur to me to check it out. But
now that I have discovered it, I have read several chapter and learnt a
great deal about Ada \o/

Natasha