From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,e36020a4e7d24836 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!feeder.news-service.com!94.75.214.39.MISMATCH!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: localhost@example.org Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: How to leave .ali files in original library? Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 09:02:30 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Message-ID: References: <87zkp4uhjl.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: EUGFoB16xwXVxMnkfdNfCw.user.speranza.aioe.org X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:18075 Date: 2011-03-11T09:02:30+00:00 List-Id: > I can't speak for the OP, but the obvious reason is that they cause > vendor> lock-in. If any significant amount of your project's functionality > is tied up in .GPR files, then that functionality is not portable to > another Ada compiler. (.GPR files are not Ada!). Of course you're right but I'm only writing very small apps trying to learn Ada at this point. But in principle my objection is what you said and that's why I said I try not to learn non-transferrable bits because it's a waste of time in my opinion.