From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,807ea75fdd8baa41 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!94.75.214.39.MISMATCH!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: localhost@example.org Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Some questions on packaging Ada code Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 11:29:58 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Message-ID: References: <4d76c78f$0$22138$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 1fBP04fsPqTkkcvlQyUnMA.user.speranza.aioe.org X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:18956 Date: 2011-03-09T11:29:58+00:00 List-Id: > Lets back up a little here to make sure all is clear: > > (1) I thought you just wanted to build a Linux executable on Linux. Yes. > (2) If you wanted to build a windows executable on Linux, then that is > a different matter. I was asking how easy or practical it is. If not, I'll attempt to do it on Windows later. > To link to a static library instead of a shared one, I normally > just link to the .a version of the library instead of the .so > version. This is a general statement, there might be specific > things you need to do relating to compiler options and such > depending on which compiler you are using. It looks as another poster explained this in more detail. I'm new to all this so I didn't exactly understand you. > If you want to build a windows static executable, then I would do > everything on windows not on Linux. Why make life harder than > it needs to. Ok thanks :)