From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,dbe443728585f8d0
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-FeedAbuse: http://nntpfeed.proxad.net/abuse.pl feeded by 88.191.16.109
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder1-2.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder2-2.proxad.net!nntpfeed.proxad.net!nospam.fr.eu.org!usenet-fr.net!gegeweb.org!news.motzarella.org!motzarella.org!news.motzarella.org!not-for-mail
From: Nicholas Paul Collin Gloucester <Colin_Paul_Gloster@ACM.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: AWS Sites
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 20:46:11 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <slrngqtq62.mv3.Colin_Paul_Gloster@Bluewhite64.example.net>
References: 6a20302f-e469-4701-b82c-26ff3104e36a@l16g2000yqo.googlegroups.com
 <dbd65cb4-c87a-43c5-9b8e-38abddef4079@m24g2000vbp.googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: news.eternal-september.org
 U2FsdGVkX1+B5x/UONsoPA1M7NbpUcaWcn2lz3EMtcbDHunzq21F82zIVCO1C/x3VI+szPQERglAFEboa/kmVLII3JV1igWNMO0jDBHo4XoR8Cg41LD7kAZhnWkpCN6IbBCK5EuD6wsH+fPbOIGThg==
X-Complaints-To: Please send complaints to abuse@motzarella.org with full
 headers
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 20:46:11 +0000 (UTC)
X-Auth-Sender: 
 U2FsdGVkX18i2HsW0CgCUkmgLeplK37o1sqBU6rkWgrJuULZvdsSgJItE0XWC5Claj4vJs35AG4=
Cancel-Lock: sha1:zDB8XTihSP4hXW9dBIQtkqs4Lig=
User-Agent: slrn/0.9.9p1 (Linux)
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:3950
Date: 2009-03-04T20:46:11+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 2009-03-04, Graham Stark <graham.stark@virtual-worlds.biz> wrote:

|----------------------------------------------------------------------|
|"[..]                                                                 |
|                                                                      |
|Apache is likely to be much faster at serving static pages but AWS    |
|will likely outrun a typical dynamic setup using Apache/PHP or Java or|
|whatever. It's actually straightforward to use both together, with    |
|Apache serving the images, etc. and AWS doing the hard bits.          |
|                                                                      |
|[..]"                                                                 |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------|

How would AWS's dynamic performance compare against a Lisp webserver?
(Not that I would like Lisp's encouraging of dynamism where dynamism
is inappropriate.)

Yours sincerely,
Colin Paul Gloster