From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,cbb5b0d14f503195 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!news.enst.fr!not-for-mail From: Jerome Hugues Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Working with incompetent adaists / unsafe typing war story Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 09:27:04 +0000 (UTC) Organization: ENST, France Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: vautrin.enst.fr Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: avanie.enst.fr 1140168424 84161 137.194.200.38 (17 Feb 2006 09:27:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@enst.fr NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 09:27:04 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.3 (SunOS) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2928 Date: 2006-02-17T09:27:04+00:00 List-Id: In article , Jean-Pierre Rosen wrote: > Anonymous Coward a �crit : >> [War story snipped] >> Do you folks encounter this frequently? And what's the solution? >> Management can never appreciate the benefits of concepts like type >> safety. Strong typing is incorrectly viewed as "academic" and counter >> to progress. > > Ada was designed to induce a change in mentalities. A change in > mentality is much harder to introduce than a change of programming language. You can always cheat a little bit ;) http://thedailywtf.com/forums/60255/ShowPost.aspx "The Secret to Better C" -- Jerome