From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,fd173879a595bde,start X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!cyclone1.gnilink.net!spamkiller.gnilink.net!gnilink.net!trnddc06.POSTED!20ae255c!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada From: Anonymous Coward Subject: Default rep specs for record types - documented?? Message-Id: User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.4 (Linux) Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2005 02:21:33 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 141.149.78.234 X-Complaints-To: abuse@verizon.net X-Trace: trnddc06 1131070893 141.149.78.234 (Thu, 03 Nov 2005 21:21:33 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2005 21:21:33 EST Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:6167 Date: 2005-11-04T02:21:33+00:00 List-Id: I'm interested in finding out what the default representation of a record type is. Can I expect the sequence of elements in the default representation to match the sequence they are defined in? Pointers to where this information can be found would also be appreciated, as Cohen's book and Google fail to answer this.