From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,3e26dfa741e64e5f X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news.glorb.com!uio.no!ntnu.no!randhol From: randhol@bacchus.pvv.ntnu.no (Preben Randhol) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: GNAT GPL 2005 Edition is now available Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 07:27:21 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Norwegian university of science and technology Message-ID: References: <432919be$0$10539$4d4eb98e@read.news.fr.uu.net> <1126774252.966025.283640@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1360993.Id2EMbt9BC@linux1.krischik.com> <87vf1284wu.fsf@willow.rfc1149.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: bacchus.pvv.ntnu.no X-Trace: orkan.itea.ntnu.no 1127287641 4616 129.241.210.178 (21 Sep 2005 07:27:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@itea.ntnu.no NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 07:27:21 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: slrn/0.9.6.2 (FreeBSD) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:4977 Date: 2005-09-21T07:27:21+00:00 List-Id: In article <87vf1284wu.fsf@willow.rfc1149.net>, Samuel Tardieu wrote: >>>>>> "Martin" == Martin Krischik writes: > >Martin> And remember: As an OpenSource developer you only have to give >Martin> the sources to thouse you have given the Binaries and to no >Martin> one else. And thats fair enough. > >It depends on the Free Software licence you have chosen and what kind >of distribution you have used. For example, if you choose to >distribute your program under section 3.b) of the GPL (that is provide >sources on demand only instead of spontaneously), you have to provide >*any third party* with a copy of the sources. I don't understand. I can make a GPL program and keep it for myself or give it to one or two friends. I don't need to give it to the rest of the world even if it is GPL. So, could one in fact not just make a program which one gives to company A with the source (or at least that it is available to them)? One didn't need to give it to company B? And could one also draw up and agreement with Company A not to spread the source code and binaries or it would not be possible? I mean if Company A can spread the code or binary to any company you would not sell more than one copy... Preben