From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,da38106463609bde X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!newsfeed.freenet.de!news-lei1.dfn.de!news.uni-jena.de!not-for-mail From: Adrian Knoth Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada and multi-core CPUs Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 22:01:26 +0000 (UTC) Organization: loris.TV Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: ppc201.mipool.uni-jena.de X-Trace: lc03.rz.uni-jena.de 1126389686 14858 141.35.13.101 (10 Sep 2005 22:01:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@uni-jena.de NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 22:01:26 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.1 (Debian) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:4572 Date: 2005-09-10T22:01:26+00:00 List-Id: tmoran@acm.org wrote: >> Instead of merging, you could ... > There are many ways to make a parallel sort. My point was that here > is a very standard time consuming operation, very simple Ada code can > make a simple dual-tasking version, and that version on a hyperthreading > CPU really does run a lot faster. Only Hyperthreading with single-core or a real dual-core/SMP-system? -- mail: adi@thur.de http://adi.thur.de PGP: v2-key via keyserver Einer spinnt immer. Wenn zwei spinnen, wird's schlimmer