From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,ac9405996d0dcb7f X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!uninett.no!ntnu.no!randhol From: randhol@bacchus.pvv.ntnu.no (Preben Randhol) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Would You Fly an Airplane with a Linux-Based Control System? Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 20:04:19 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Norwegian university of science and technology Message-ID: References: <20619edc.0411251028.3e249bf3@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: bacchus.pvv.ntnu.no X-Trace: orkan.itea.ntnu.no 1101758659 15301 129.241.210.178 (29 Nov 2004 20:04:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@itea.ntnu.no NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 20:04:19 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: slrn/0.9.6.2 (FreeBSD) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:6650 Date: 2004-11-29T20:04:19+00:00 List-Id: In article Marius Amado Alves wrote: >No. This whole talk of hardware-generated exception sounds like "FUD". >Namely, it sounds like your trying to blame the hardware. The cause was >a SOFTWARE enginering error. Yes, a BUG. In the Ada software. And >because it's connected to exceptions, the hypothesis that if the thing >had been done in an exceptionless language like C the effect might have >been different. And yes, maybe less bad. And none of the explanations >I've seen so far (here, in books, and in the Internet) disprove this >hypothesis. I'm confused. Didn't they turn off all exceptions checks? Preben