From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,146e39fd3921c79f X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!news-lei1.dfn.de!news.uni-jena.de!not-for-mail From: Adrian Knoth Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: binary size (gnat+win console) Date: 1 Aug 2004 22:39:21 GMT Organization: loris.TV Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: ppc201.mipool.uni-jena.de X-Trace: fsuj29.rz.uni-jena.de 1091399961 16914 141.35.13.101 (1 Aug 2004 22:39:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: news@rz.uni-jena.de NNTP-Posting-Date: 1 Aug 2004 22:39:21 GMT User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.0 (Linux) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2490 Date: 2004-08-01T22:39:21+00:00 List-Id: Andi wrote: > a simple "hello-world" binary takes 219kb after building!? Strange. adi@drcomp:/tmp$ ls -l Hello -rwxr-xr-x 1 adi users 21193 Aug 2 00:29 Hello adi@drcomp:/tmp$ strip Hello adi@drcomp:/tmp$ ls -l Hello -rwxr-xr-x 1 adi users 7668 Aug 2 00:29 Hello Compiler is gnat-3.15p with Ludovic's Debian-backports. But I wouldn't care too much about executable size. I guess having a more complex application wouldn't raise the size in a linear way, it's just the usual overhead (constant amount). -- mail: adi@thur.de http://adi.thur.de PGP: v2-key via keyserver Impotenz: Mit gekochten Spaghetti Mikado spielen wollen.