From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,85c4b961f840b5ab X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!fr.ip.ndsoftware.net!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!news-lei1.dfn.de!news.uni-jena.de!not-for-mail From: Adrian Knoth Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Zero length Objects Date: 2 Jul 2004 15:11:33 GMT Organization: loris.TV Message-ID: References: <2oUEc.2$S77.1@nwrdny03.gnilink.net> <2kimpdF2orakU1@uni-berlin.de> <1088697459.558708@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: ppc201.mipool.uni-jena.de X-Trace: fsuj29.rz.uni-jena.de 1088781093 7303 141.35.13.101 (2 Jul 2004 15:11:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: news@rz.uni-jena.de NNTP-Posting-Date: 2 Jul 2004 15:11:33 GMT User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.0 (Linux) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2050 Date: 2004-07-02T15:11:33+00:00 List-Id: Frank J. Lhota wrote: > This is what I love about this NG. In the thread "A simple ADA puzzle", we > had an interesting and informative discussion of how a compiler should > handle a type whose objects may be billions of bytes long. Now in this > thread, we are having an equally enlightening discussion of types whose > objects are potentially zero bytes long. Looks like we have covered both > ends of the spectrum! You missed objects with negative storage size, but I guess bufferoverflows are offtopic in cla, otherwise it'd be called comp.lang.c. -- mail: adi@thur.de http://adi.thur.de PGP: v2-key via keyserver Fighting for peace is like fucking for virginity!