From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,3e3949298ed3b36 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!news-FFM2.ecrc.net!news.iks-jena.de!not-for-mail From: Lutz Donnerhacke Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: High CPU in tasking Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 07:02:18 +0000 (UTC) Organization: IKS GmbH Jena Message-ID: References: <2k0fllF160eotU1@uni-berlin.de> <2k1114F15uoj8U1@uni-berlin.de> <2k346nF16pckjU1@uni-berlin.de> <2kdn1gF169huU1@uni-berlin.de> <2qmdnaxjEPyH0n7dRVn-sw@megapath.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: taranis.iks-jena.de X-Trace: branwen.iks-jena.de 1088665338 2645 217.17.192.37 (1 Jul 2004 07:02:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@iks-jena.de NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 07:02:18 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.0 (Linux) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2018 Date: 2004-07-01T07:02:18+00:00 List-Id: * Randy Brukardt wrote: > It should be noted that the limitation on the range of protected entry > families is a weird limitation of some versions of GNAT, and not one > intended/expected by the Ada language. GNAT is the only Ada compiler of > the ones I usually test that has this sort of limitation. Janus/Ada, for > instance, treats protected entry families as an additional parameter to > the entry (which is very different than the way task entry families are > implemented). Perhaps you'd have better performance if you didn't need > this workaround? The registration overhead is small, so I do expect only the significant drop in management overhead.