From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,3cb0c0deb57c863d
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!news.agarik.com!news.agarik.com!usenet-fr.net!enst.fr!not-for-mail
From: Jerome Hugues <hugues@nospam*merlin.enst.fr>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: PolyORB 1.1r
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 07:50:34 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: ENST, France
Message-ID: <slrnccdga9.41c.hugues@merlin.enst.fr>
References: <rfgu0xl6aut.fsf@dorine.enst.fr> <873c55afr0.fsf@insalien.org>
 <HHsxc.7264$uX2.3752@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net>
 <87y8mx8g4p.fsf@insalien.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: merlin.enst.fr
X-Trace: avanie.enst.fr 1086767434 10410 137.194.160.24 (9 Jun 2004 07:50:34
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@enst.fr
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 07:50:34 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.3 (SunOS)
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:1283
Date: 2004-06-09T07:50:34+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <87y8mx8g4p.fsf@insalien.org>, Ludovic Brenta wrote:

> Why does PolyORB require GCC 3.4? Does it use Ada 2005 features?  If
> it's just because of pragma Unreferenced, it is trivial to patch it to
> compile with 3.15p.

PolyORB uses no Ada 2005 features. PolyORB may compile with 3.15p,
there are still work around for 3.15 concerning e.g. pragma Unreferenced.

PolyORB does not require GCC 3.4.0, it is just that it is no more
tested with 3.15p. Besides, we got feedback that it compiles with
3.15p on Linux.

-- 
Jerome