From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,9aa4352fa83d37dc
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-03-01 10:41:52 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!feed.news.tiscali.de!uio.no!ntnu.no!not-for-mail
From: Preben Randhol <randhol+valid_for_reply_from_news@pvv.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: library level required or not?
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 18:41:51 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: PVV
Message-ID: 
 <slrnc470vd.a04.randhol+valid_for_reply_from_news@k-083152.nt.ntnu.no>
References: <200403011717.22528.maa@liacc.up.pt>
 <mailman.49.1078166316.327.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: k-083152.nt.ntnu.no
X-Trace: tyfon.itea.ntnu.no 1078166511 17013 129.241.83.152 (1 Mar 2004
 18:41:51 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@itea.ntnu.no
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 18:41:51 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.0 (Linux)
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:5983
Date: 2004-03-01T18:41:51+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 2004-03-01, Marius Amado Alves <maa@liacc.up.pt> wrote:
>
> Ok, I found Ada Issue 115, which clarifies that "a language-defined generic 
> package may be instantiated at any nesting depth."
>
> I'm still in the dark regarding unbounded strings though, as 
> Ada.Strings.Unbounded is not generic.

What do you mean?

-- 
"Saving keystrokes is the job of the text editor, not the programming
 language."