From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,a00006d3c4735d70
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-02-25 09:11:31 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!newsfeed1.e.nsc.no!nsc.no!nextra.com!uio.no!ntnu.no!not-for-mail
From: Preben Randhol <randhol+valid_for_reply_from_news@pvv.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: In-Out Parameters for functions
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 17:11:29 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: PVV
Message-ID: 
 <slrnc3plpv.lq0.randhol+valid_for_reply_from_news@k-083152.nt.ntnu.no>
References: <1075987360.225622@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> <40236C0B.E988E003@0.0>
 <xay_b.429$ax2.177@nwrdny03.gnilink.net>
 <pan.2004.02.24.01.44.30.311621@email.ro>
 <1077634311.254581@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>
 <pan.2004.02.24.23.23.33.578111@email.ro>
 <mailman.20.1077669870.327.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
 <pan.2004.02.25.09.01.17.858502@email.ro>
 <1077718871.47635@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>
 <54cp3095jmv8s17h63d4bjdus0tec7l7pt@jellix.jlfencey.com>
 <1077721343.481619@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>
 <ljgp301lgj3r0totpo3hlkmt3dbnbe0i33@jellix.jlfencey.com>
 <1077724400.221032@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>
 <slrnc3pjmj.l1h.randhol+valid_for_reply_from_news@k-083152.nt.ntnu.no>
 <1077728214.676718@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: k-083152.nt.ntnu.no
X-Trace: tyfon.itea.ntnu.no 1077729089 17373 129.241.83.152 (25 Feb 2004
 17:11:29 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@itea.ntnu.no
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 17:11:29 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.0 (Linux)
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:5806
Date: 2004-02-25T17:11:29+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 2004-02-25, Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com> wrote:
> Yes, so? As I said, if the compiler knows that sqrt(x)
> is free of side effects, it can go ahead and evaluate
> b first and never call sqrt(x) if b is false.
> That's true in both forms above. It doesn't matter how
> you write it. If sqrt(x) is free of side effects, you
> cannot know whether it has been called, as far as the
> language definition is concerned.

My point was that when you use the and then you tell the compiler to
evaluate left-side before right. Whereas if you use only and it is not
given which side will be evaluated first. At least I thought so.

-- 
"Saving keystrokes is the job of the text editor, not the programming
 language."