From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f5d71,304c86061dc69dba
X-Google-Attributes: gidf5d71,public
X-Google-Thread: 1014db,304c86061dc69dba
X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public
X-Google-Thread: 109fba,304c86061dc69dba
X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,5cb36983754f64da
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-02-11 10:23:14 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!uio.no!ntnu.no!not-for-mail
From: Preben Randhol <randhol+valid_for_reply_from_news@pvv.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.java
Subject: Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping
 language)
Followup-To: comp.lang.ada
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 18:23:14 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: PVV
Message-ID: 
 <slrnc2ksoh.djj.randhol+valid_for_reply_from_news@k-083152.nt.ntnu.no>
References: <20040206174017.7E84F4C4114@lovelace.ada-france.org>
 <mailman.3.1076142690.295.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
 <m3isij11u4.fsf_-_@insalien.org>
 <54759e7e.0402071124.322ea376@posting.google.com>
 <2460735.u7KiuvdgQP@linux1.krischik.com>
 <54759e7e.0402081525.50c7adae@posting.google.com>
 <Xns9489AEC0F8702jimmaureenrogers@204.127.36.1>
 <54759e7e.0402091826.2847e0c@posting.google.com>
 <vjah20tahj48fftkpeghp29ugnojfdd4r4@4ax.com>
 <54759e7e.0402101819.95cec1d@posting.google.com>
 <qdqj20lomb5865p7qb24eojpgk7ijpbikr@4ax.com> <c0djup$3fr6@cui1.lmms.lmco.com>
 <slrnc2kn4d.aav.randhol+valid_for_reply_from_news@k-083152.nt.ntnu.no>
 <c0dpkg$4178@cui1.lmms.lmco.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: k-083152.nt.ntnu.no
X-Trace: tyfon.itea.ntnu.no 1076523794 23655 129.241.83.152 (11 Feb 2004
 18:23:14 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@itea.ntnu.no
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 18:23:14 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.0 (Linux)
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:5444 comp.lang.c:21921
 comp.lang.c++:18736 comp.lang.java:2861
Date: 2004-02-11T18:23:14+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

["Followup-To:" header set to comp.lang.ada.]
On 2004-02-11, Xenos <dont.spam.me@spamhate.com> wrote:
>
> "Preben Randhol" <randhol+valid_for_reply_from_news@pvv.org> wrote in
> message
> news:slrnc2kn4d.aav.randhol+valid_for_reply_from_news@k-083152.nt.ntnu.no...
>>
>> Yes, you won't get a buffer overflow.
>>
> You wouldn't of gotten a buffer overflow either way, it would have raised a
> constraint_error.

Not in C.

But you cut that example out.

-- 
"Saving keystrokes is the job of the text editor, not the programming
 language."