From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f5d71,304c86061dc69dba
X-Google-Attributes: gidf5d71,public
X-Google-Thread: 109fba,304c86061dc69dba
X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,5cb36983754f64da
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Thread: 1014db,304c86061dc69dba
X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-02-11 08:47:10 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.vmunix.org!uio.no!ntnu.no!not-for-mail
From: Preben Randhol <randhol+valid_for_reply_from_news@pvv.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.java
Subject: Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping
 language)
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 16:47:10 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: PVV
Message-ID: 
 <slrnc2kn4d.aav.randhol+valid_for_reply_from_news@k-083152.nt.ntnu.no>
References: <20040206174017.7E84F4C4114@lovelace.ada-france.org>
 <mailman.3.1076142690.295.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
 <m3isij11u4.fsf_-_@insalien.org>
 <54759e7e.0402071124.322ea376@posting.google.com>
 <2460735.u7KiuvdgQP@linux1.krischik.com>
 <54759e7e.0402081525.50c7adae@posting.google.com>
 <Xns9489AEC0F8702jimmaureenrogers@204.127.36.1>
 <54759e7e.0402091826.2847e0c@posting.google.com>
 <vjah20tahj48fftkpeghp29ugnojfdd4r4@4ax.com>
 <54759e7e.0402101819.95cec1d@posting.google.com>
 <qdqj20lomb5865p7qb24eojpgk7ijpbikr@4ax.com> <c0djup$3fr6@cui1.lmms.lmco.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: k-083152.nt.ntnu.no
X-Trace: tyfon.itea.ntnu.no 1076518030 20342 129.241.83.152 (11 Feb 2004
 16:47:10 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@itea.ntnu.no
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 16:47:10 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.0 (Linux)
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:5442 comp.lang.c:21904
 comp.lang.c++:18715 comp.lang.java:2858
Date: 2004-02-11T16:47:10+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 2004-02-11, Xenos <dont.spam.me@spamhate.com> wrote:
> But of course, the first example will only work if S'Length is equal to
> T'Length or it will raise a constraint_error.  The second will only work if
> T'Length is greater than or equal to S'Length.

Yes, you won't get a buffer overflow.


Preben
-- 
"When Roman engineers built a bridge, they had to stand under it while
 the first legion  marched across.  If programmers today  worked under
 similar  ground rules,  they might well find  themselves getting much
 more interested in Ada!"                              -- Robert Dewar