From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,dfe340a115a0bc1
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-02-04 01:13:45 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!news.tdcnorge.no!uninett.no!ntnu.no!not-for-mail
From: Preben Randhol <randhol+valid_for_reply_from_news@pvv.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Naming convention for classes?
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 09:13:45 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: PVV
Message-ID: 
 <slrnc21du8.290.randhol+valid_for_reply_from_news@k-083152.nt.ntnu.no>
References: <MPG.1a89fe0b56e324d998968e@news.sover.net>
 <G%WTb.12124$uM2.2382@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>
 <MPG.1a8a2399b416094998968f@news.sover.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: k-083152.nt.ntnu.no
X-Trace: tyfon.itea.ntnu.no 1075886025 6109 129.241.83.152 (4 Feb 2004
 09:13:45 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@itea.ntnu.no
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 09:13:45 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.0 (Linux)
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:5213
Date: 2004-02-04T09:13:45+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 2004-02-04, Peter C Chapin <pchapin@sover.net> wrote:
>
> Okay, so in other words either approach is considered acceptable by the 
> community at large. It's a matter of style. At least that's the 
> impression I get from your reply. Does that sound like a fair 
> assessment?

My advice is to use senisble names for the types in the packages and try
to avoid using the "use" statement for the packages you built yourself.

-- 
"Saving keystrokes is the job of the text editor, not the programming
 language."