From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,561ac97c34d8f8ef
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-01-21 23:56:56 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!uninett.no!ntnu.no!not-for-mail
From: Preben Randhol <randhol+valid_for_reply_from_news@pvv.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: OT-spam detection, was Re: WM, and lindens rustled
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 07:56:56 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: PVV
Message-ID: 
 <slrnc0v0i8.r3.randhol+valid_for_reply_from_news@k-083152.nt.ntnu.no>
References: <mailman.9.1074679047.281.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
 <mbzPb.97939$sv6.404211@attbi_s52> <100tknotk84nfe0@corp.supernews.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: k-083152.nt.ntnu.no
X-Trace: tyfon.itea.ntnu.no 1074758216 21592 129.241.83.152 (22 Jan 2004
 07:56:56 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@itea.ntnu.no
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 07:56:56 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.0 (Linux)
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:4627
Date: 2004-01-22T07:56:56+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 2004-01-21, Randy Brukardt <randy@rrsoftware.com> wrote:
> Certainly mine does. (It uses a dictionary of known common e-mail words.
> Most of those aren't in it.) But anything that only works on words (and not
> on the relationships) will have trouble with such things, if the words are
> valid. Which is why I don't think Bayesian filters work because of the words
> (even though that how they are usually described), but rather because of the
> HTML markup (which, often hides word lists like that).
>

My Bayesian filter filters out these SPAM messages.

Preben
-- 
"Saving keystrokes is the job of the text editor, not the programming
 language."