From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,60e2922351e0e780 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-11-21 01:28:43 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!fu-berlin.de!news.eunet.no!uninett.no!ntnu.no!not-for-mail From: Preben Randhol Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: OT: Nuclear Waste (Was Re-Marketing Ada) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 09:28:42 +0000 (UTC) Organization: PVV Message-ID: References: <49cbf610.0311191248.7eb48a43@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.241.83.78 X-Trace: tyfon.itea.ntnu.no 1069406922 28703 129.241.83.78 (21 Nov 2003 09:28:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@itea.ntnu.no NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 09:28:42 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.0 (Linux) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2788 Date: 2003-11-21T09:28:42+00:00 List-Id: On 2003-11-21, Dmitry A Kazakov wrote: > In a long term perspective, there is no alternative to nuclear energy. > CO2 emission is rather a short term problem. You never know. The main reason why so much fossile fule is used is the low cost. Wind, wave, and solar power are also good alternatives, but the electricity is much more expensive. Unfortunately there is little research in alternative power sources. -- "Saving keystrokes is the job of the text editor, not the programming language."