From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,60e2922351e0e780
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-11-21 01:25:31 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!uninett.no!ntnu.no!not-for-mail
From: Preben Randhol <randhol+valid_for_reply_from_news@pvv.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: OT: Nuclear Waste (Was Re-Marketing Ada)
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 09:25:30 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: PVV
Message-ID: 
 <slrnbrrmgc.184.randhol+valid_for_reply_from_news@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no>
References: 
 <slrnbqug4j.ss.randhol+valid_for_reply_from_news@kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no>
 <ZuudnWONTe-cnyyiRVn-iQ@gbronline.com>
 <bor2ji$1h7730$1@ID-175126.news.uni-berlin.de> <3FB22125.1040807@noplace.com>
 <botbde$1hvqjj$1@ID-175126.news.uni-berlin.de> <3FB3751D.5090809@noplace.com>
 <JtPsb.8014$fB3.463946@news20.bellglobal.com>
 <bebbba07.0311161831.bce38a5@posting.google.com>
 <Az7ub.3669$ZF1.458179@news20.bellglobal.com>
 <1069092089.51926@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> <bpib7a$9lb$1@a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de>
 <1069341262.907029@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>
 <slrnbrq59k.105.randhol+valid_for_reply_from_news@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no>
 <xucvb.194818$mZ5.1448977@attbi_s54>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.241.83.78
X-Trace: tyfon.itea.ntnu.no 1069406730 28703 129.241.83.78 (21 Nov 2003
 09:25:30 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@itea.ntnu.no
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 09:25:30 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.0 (Linux)
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2787
Date: 2003-11-21T09:25:30+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 2003-11-20, Larry Elmore <ljelmoreat@comcastdot.net> wrote:
> Preben Randhol wrote:
>> On 2003-11-20, Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>>The proper way to deal with new technology is to give it some minimal
>>>amount of testing, looking for obvious problems, and if none are present,
>>>go off and use it. If it turns out that problems appear subsequently,
>>>clean them up.
>> 
>> 
>> You mean the debrie after a couple of planes went down due to untested
>> software?
>
> Straw man. No one said "untested" except you.

OK, fair enough. 

Rephrasing: 

You mean the debrie after a couple of planes went down due to minimal
amount of testing.

or perhaps the debrie of the Ariane missels?

-- 
"Saving keystrokes is the job of the text editor, not the programming
 language."