From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,60e2922351e0e780
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-11-18 03:33:32 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!news.tdcnorge.no!uninett.no!ntnu.no!not-for-mail
From: Preben Randhol <randhol+valid_for_reply_from_news@pvv.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Clause "with and use"
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 11:33:31 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: PVV
Message-ID: 
 <slrnbrk0sb.ap6.randhol+valid_for_reply_from_news@kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no>
References: <3FA2CDCB.500F4AF0@fakeaddress.nil>
 <bebbba07.0310312309.77c6d82f@posting.google.com> <uism44c1k.fsf@wanadoo.fr>
 <3FA3B412.AF3BEB96@fakeaddress.nil> <uekwr4u1k.fsf@wanadoo.fr>
 <Ve5pb.36825$294.35899@nwrdny03.gnilink.net>
 <slrnbq9qti.qu.randhol+valid_for_reply_from_news@kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no>
 <3FA50083.10709@noplace.com>
 <slrnbqcpv6.2io.randhol+valid_for_reply_from_news@kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no>
 <3FA777E9.4030605@noplace.com>
 <slrnbqf309.nb.randhol+valid_for_reply_from_news@kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no>
 <3FA79F58.1020503@noplace.com> <IcqdnT94IaURVDqiRVn-tA@gbronline.com>
 <mailman.274.1067962159.25614.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
 <bpbnq4$ccl$1@news.wplus.net>
 <mailman.20.1069145418.3110.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
 <slrnbrjtu8.6uh.randhol+valid_for_reply_from_news@kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no>
 <mailman.22.1069153107.3110.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.241.83.82
X-Trace: tyfon.itea.ntnu.no 1069155211 23537 129.241.83.82 (18 Nov 2003
 11:33:31 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@itea.ntnu.no
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 11:33:31 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.0 (Linux)
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2619
Date: 2003-11-18T11:33:31+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 2003-11-18, Marius Amado Alves <amado.alves@netcabo.pt> wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 10:43, Preben Randhol wrote:
>> with Gtk.Arguments;        use @;
>> with Gtk.Button;           use @;
>> with Gtk.Handlers;
>
> I like it.
>
>> with Gtk.Arguments;
>> with Gtk.Button;
>> with Gtk.Handlers;
>> use @;
>> use @;
>
> That would be equivalent to
>
> with Gtk.Arguments;
> with Gtk.Button;
> with Gtk.Handlers;
> use Gtk.Handlers;
> use Gtk.Handlers;
>
> which I'm not sure would even compile.

My point is that since:

   with Something;
   use Something;
 
are two differnet sentences and the last can appear anywhere the whole
idem or @ is just silly. Besides all it saves is keystrokes, and that is
....

-- 
"Saving keystrokes is the job of the text editor, not the programming
 language."