From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,60e2922351e0e780
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-11-11 07:04:11 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!uio.no!ntnu.no!not-for-mail
From: Preben Randhol <randhol+valid_for_reply_from_news@pvv.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Clause "with and use"
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 15:04:11 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: PVV
Message-ID: 
 <slrnbr1ujb.74s.randhol+valid_for_reply_from_news@kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no>
References: <3FA2CDCB.500F4AF0@fakeaddress.nil>
 <1068123815.335508@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>
 <Duvqb.21219$mB5.927593@news20.bellglobal.com>
 <3FAAB12E.C7593B45@fakeaddress.nil>
 <slrnbqmn3k.pk.randhol+valid_for_reply_from_news@kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no>
 <3FACCBFB.9D288CF2@fakeaddress.nil>
 <bebbba07.0311081140.e0e94e6@posting.google.com>
 <slrnbqug4j.ss.randhol+valid_for_reply_from_news@kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no>
 <3FAF8C99.5040201@noplace.com>
 <bebbba07.0311102320.7fba665a@posting.google.com>
 <slrnbr17j1.1qo.randhol+valid_for_reply_from_news@kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no>
 <1068561335.260886@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no
X-Trace: tyfon.itea.ntnu.no 1068563051 23702 129.241.83.82 (11 Nov 2003
 15:04:11 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@itea.ntnu.no
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 15:04:11 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.0 (Linux)
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2349
Date: 2003-11-11T15:04:11+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 2003-11-11, Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com> wrote:
> Preben Randhol wrote:
>> But what is the point? What do you save by doing this? Absolutely
>> nothing. It took me 2 min to make two macros in vim which either add a
>> use unit or removes it.
>
> That's *not* the point. As is so often said around here,
> Ada doesn't care about the convenience of the writer of
> the code. Perhaps if you had written macros to tell the
> reader of the code which withed packages were also used,
> you would have demonstrated something useful.

You misunderstood.

In my code I write:

with Ada.Text_IO; \au

The \au which is my shortcut (it could have been Ctrl-J or F4 etc...
depending on preference) will then make this line look like:

with Ada.Text_IO; use Ada.Text_IO;

and I can continue typing. 

It will work with any withed package as it simply copies what comes
after with until the ;. A shortcut \aU removes the use Package; from a
line.

There is no preprosessors involded. As I have said: the convenience of
the writer is the responsibility of the text editor (in my case vim) not
Ada.

As to telling the reader which packages are used, the source code will
say so and you cannot manage to make it much clearer IMHO.

-- 
"Saving keystrokes is the job of the text editor, not the programming
 language."