From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,8b0d028e57f221d4 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-11-07 07:13:54 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!fu-berlin.de!news.eunet.no!uninett.no!ntnu.no!not-for-mail From: Preben Randhol Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Trying to import a C function Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 15:13:53 +0000 (UTC) Organization: PVV Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no X-Trace: tyfon.itea.ntnu.no 1068218033 13505 129.241.83.82 (7 Nov 2003 15:13:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@itea.ntnu.no NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 15:13:53 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.0 (Linux) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2204 Date: 2003-11-07T15:13:53+00:00 List-Id: On 2003-11-07, Adrian Knoth wrote: > Preben Randhol wrote: > >>> type dev_t is new ushort; >> Isn't dev_t a ulonglong? > > sys/types.h: > typedef __dev_t dev_t; > > bits/types.h: > typedef __u_quad_t __dev_t; /* Type of device numbers. */ > __extension__ typedef unsigned long long int __u_quad_t; > > So to say, dev_t is ulonglong. Yes. Lutz wrote: type dev_t is new ushort; so that is why I was wondering. -- "Saving keystrokes is the job of the text editor, not the programming language."