From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,de0abe9655235740 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-11-06 00:14:47 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!fu-berlin.de!news.tdcnorge.no!uninett.no!ntnu.no!not-for-mail From: Preben Randhol Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: ACM Ada Letters Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 08:14:43 +0000 (UTC) Organization: PVV Message-ID: References: <1065708924.347689@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> <3F864440.7070203@noplace.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no X-Trace: tyfon.itea.ntnu.no 1068106483 13702 129.241.83.82 (6 Nov 2003 08:14:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@itea.ntnu.no NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 08:14:43 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.0 (Linux) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2123 Date: 2003-11-06T08:14:43+00:00 List-Id: On 2003-11-05, Pat Rogers wrote: > By the way, Word is only preferred in the sense that I cannot handle > LaTex or FrameMaker or something like that. People typically want to > send their submissions in the format of the tool that produced the > document itself. Also, I can make trivial changes for people if they > send their submissions in Word. As it mentions in the Guidelines for > Authors, PDF is perfectly acceptable, as is Postscript. Why can't you handle LaTeX? LaTeX produces both PS and PDF. Preben -- "Saving keystrokes is the job of the text editor, not the programming language."