From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,459feef56669b92d X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-11-03 06:23:04 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!uninett.no!ntnu.no!not-for-mail From: Preben Randhol Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: "continue/next" for "loop" Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 14:23:03 +0000 (UTC) Organization: PVV Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no X-Trace: tyfon.itea.ntnu.no 1067869383 6922 129.241.83.82 (3 Nov 2003 14:23:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@itea.ntnu.no NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 14:23:03 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.0 (Linux) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:1978 Date: 2003-11-03T14:23:03+00:00 List-Id: On 2003-11-03, christoph.grein@eurocopter.com wrote: > Really, Lutz, I do not see why you by any force would like a solution > without goto. It's the most appropriate solution in this case! > > The goto solution is better understandable than the boolean condition > one. And it's simpler. Has anyone noticed that More_Statments are > missing in the non-goto solution? > > Why is the goto braindead? Your coding standards forbit it? I hate > those silly standards which forbid the most natural solution. Links on this: (Ada, goto and state machine) Preben -- "Saving keystrokes is the job of the text editor, not the programming language."