From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,459feef56669b92d
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-11-03 02:55:24 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!uninett.no!ntnu.no!not-for-mail
From: Preben Randhol <randhol+valid_for_reply_from_news@pvv.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: "continue/next" for "loop"
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 10:55:24 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: PVV
Message-ID: 
 <slrnbqcd0s.9jl.randhol+valid_for_reply_from_news@kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no>
References: <slrnbqccj0.m1.lutz@taranis.iks-jena.de>
 <slrnbqccpb.9jl.randhol+valid_for_reply_from_news@kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no>
NNTP-Posting-Host: kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no
X-Trace: tyfon.itea.ntnu.no 1067856924 29736 129.241.83.82 (3 Nov 2003
 10:55:24 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@itea.ntnu.no
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 10:55:24 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.0 (Linux)
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:1957
Date: 2003-11-03T10:55:24+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 2003-11-03, Preben Randhol <randhol+valid_for_reply_from_news@pvv.org> wrote:
> On 2003-11-03, Lutz Donnerhacke <lutz@iks-jena.de> wrote:
>> I might be out of coffee, but I do not find an elegant way to skip the rest
>> of a loop body for the current cycle other than using "goto".
>>
>> with Ada.Text_IO;   use Ada.Text_IO;
>>
>> procedure t is
>> begin
>>    for j in 2 .. 8 loop
>>       for i in 2 .. 8 loop
>
>>          if i mod j = 0 then  --  Assume complex statements here.
>>             goto next;        --  In my real case, it's another loop,
>>          end if;              --  which detects the end of current path inside.
>>          Put(i'Img);
>>          <<next>> null;
>
> You cannot do:
>
>          if i mod j != 0 then

ARG!       if i mod j /= 0 then

Been reading C sources :-(

-- 
"Saving keystrokes is the job of the text editor, not the programming
 language."