From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,3132fa2f1b036425 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-11-03 02:33:06 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!newsfeed.freenet.de!feed.news.nacamar.de!newsfeed.stueberl.de!newsfeed.vmunix.org!news-FFM2.ecrc.net!news.iks-jena.de!not-for-mail From: Lutz Donnerhacke Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: number_base Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 10:33:06 +0000 (UTC) Organization: IKS GmbH Jena Message-ID: References: <49cbf610.0310311258.2024b12b@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: taranis.iks-jena.de X-Trace: branwen.iks-jena.de 1067855586 3138 217.17.192.37 (3 Nov 2003 10:33:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@iks-jena.de NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 10:33:06 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.4 (Linux) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:1953 Date: 2003-11-03T10:33:06+00:00 List-Id: * Dmitry A Kazakov wrote: > Wasn't it actually e or Pi? I remotely remember something like that. e is the most efficient base to store large numbers. Unfortunaly hardware to the base e is difficult to develop. That's why most systems choose the next natural number around e to store date to this base.