From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,dbc63810b4ca3da5 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-10-23 14:39:18 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!feed.news.nacamar.de!newsfeed.stueberl.de!teaser.fr!enst.fr!pautet From: pautet@antigone.enst.fr (Laurent Pautet) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Is CORBA dead for Ada Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 21:37:53 +0000 (UTC) Organization: ENST, France Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: antigone.enst.fr X-Trace: avanie.enst.fr 1066945073 64528 137.194.162.28 (23 Oct 2003 21:37:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@enst.fr NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 21:37:53 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: slrn/0.9.6.2 (SunOS) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:1548 Date: 2003-10-23T21:37:53+00:00 List-Id: In article , Volkert wrote: >Strange ... Mr Pautet you are one persons behind polyorb ... polyorb leads >to ACT. If i can get support from ACT for polyorb so why does ACT (as an >orb vendor) not participate in the maintanance of corba standard? As far as I am concerned, I don't see the maintenance of the Ada mapping as a research interest (anyway, I would need a funding to participate to it). But in the context of schizophrenic middleware, I am interested in an up-to-date mapping. Concerning ACT, ask them. -- -- Laurent