From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,dbc63810b4ca3da5 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-10-23 09:48:59 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!enst.fr!pautet From: pautet@antigone.enst.fr (Laurent Pautet) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Is CORBA dead for Ada Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 16:47:59 +0000 (UTC) Organization: ENST, France Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: antigone.enst.fr X-Trace: avanie.enst.fr 1066927679 63909 137.194.162.28 (23 Oct 2003 16:47:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@enst.fr NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 16:47:59 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: slrn/0.9.6.2 (SunOS) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:1528 Date: 2003-10-23T16:47:59+00:00 List-Id: Lionel.DRAGHI@fr.thalesgroup.com wrote: >But original laurent's demand was about standart. If Ada ORB do not stick to >the latest CORBA version, it will cause interoperability problems, and will >be also interpreted as a further Ada influence loss. Thanks Lionel. Indeed my question is the current status of the mapping. I must apologize for having started this troll but at least one CORBA tool vendor is now on-line :) We had the advertising part about their technology, we are now waiting for an answer about the mapping :)) -- -- Laurent