From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,54889de51045a215 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-10-21 05:07:51 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed1!bredband!uio.no!ntnu.no!not-for-mail From: Preben Randhol Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: += in ada Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 12:07:51 +0000 (UTC) Organization: PVV Message-ID: References: <1066224357.499523@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> <1066231159.711433@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> <1066311805.222491@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> <3F8F3077.60402@comcast.net> <3F900F35.50203@comcast.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no X-Trace: tyfon.itea.ntnu.no 1066738071 23571 129.241.83.82 (21 Oct 2003 12:07:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@itea.ntnu.no NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 12:07:51 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.0 (Linux) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:1273 Date: 2003-10-21T12:07:51+00:00 List-Id: On 2003-10-21, Hyman Rosen wrote: > Wes Groleau wrote: >> I don't think Ada's alleged "awkward syntax" >> is a reason for its unpopularity. > > All I know is that when I first became aware of Ada many > years ago, my reaction was "Oh no! Pascal! Why did it have > to be Pascal?" (or something to that effect, since I guess > Ada predates the Indiana Jones movies). I don't think I > ever recovered from that initial visceral dislike. Funny I had the same reaction. However, I recovered fast. Preben -- "Saving keystrokes is the job of the text editor, not the programming language."