From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,54889de51045a215
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-10-16 05:46:05 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.vmunix.org!news-FFM2.ecrc.net!news.iks-jena.de!not-for-mail
From: Lutz Donnerhacke <lutz@iks-jena.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: += in ada
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 12:46:04 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: IKS GmbH Jena
Message-ID: <slrnbot4oc.nr.lutz@taranis.iks-jena.de>
References: <3F7316F7.219F@mail.ru>
 <17cd177c.0310010606.52da88f3@posting.google.com> <3F8BC74F.2CFBFF37@0.0>
 <bebbba07.0310160049.3ede5878@posting.google.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: taranis.iks-jena.de
X-Trace: branwen.iks-jena.de 1066308364 2208 217.17.192.37 (16 Oct 2003
 12:46:04 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@iks-jena.de
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 12:46:04 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.4 (Linux)
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:971
Date: 2003-10-16T12:46:04+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

* Russ wrote:
> Actually, a competent programmer will define the "+" operator in terms
> of the ":+" operator rather than vice versa, because the ":+" is
> usually more efficient (since it has no need for temporaries and extra
> copying).

Wrong.