From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,54889de51045a215 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-10-06 01:13:18 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.vmunix.org!news-FFM2.ecrc.net!news.iks-jena.de!not-for-mail From: Lutz Donnerhacke Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: += in ada Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2003 08:13:17 +0000 (UTC) Organization: IKS GmbH Jena Message-ID: References: <3F7316F7.219F@mail.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: taranis.iks-jena.de X-Trace: branwen.iks-jena.de 1065427997 21928 217.17.192.37 (6 Oct 2003 08:13:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@iks-jena.de NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2003 08:13:17 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.4 (Linux) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:296 Date: 2003-10-06T08:13:17+00:00 List-Id: * Jean-Pierre Rosen wrote: > I'm surprised that nobody suggested that (or I missed it), but why not > define an attribute: Because it is too special to add to the language. The idem Idiom is much more general and addresses the problem behind the question.