From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,e1bb9627c57b7d5b
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-10-04 05:16:57 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!uninett.no!ntnu.no!not-for-mail
From: Preben Randhol <randhol+valid_for_reply_from_news@pvv.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: U : Unbounded_String := "bla bla bla"; (was: Is the Writing...)
Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2003 12:16:56 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: PVV
Message-ID: 
 <slrnbntehp.sr.randhol+valid_for_reply_from_news@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no>
References: <mailman.31.1065197729.25614.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no
X-Trace: tyfon.itea.ntnu.no 1065269816 1173 129.241.83.78 (4 Oct 2003 12:16:56
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@itea.ntnu.no
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2003 12:16:56 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.0 (Linux)
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:213
Date: 2003-10-04T12:16:56+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 2003-10-03, amado.alves <amado.alves@netcabo.pt> wrote:
> "It's alright to make legal things illegal (E.g.,
> pragma restrictions) but not the other way." (Mark)
>
> Then make the implicit conversion legal, and supply the restriction
> No_Implicit_Conversion ;-)

Why not use C instead?

Preben