From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,1116ece181be1aea
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-10-02 06:07:59 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!npeer.de.kpn-eurorings.net!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!newsfeed1.e.nsc.no!nsc.no!nextra.com!uio.no!ntnu.no!not-for-mail
From: Preben Randhol <randhol+valid_for_reply_from_news@pvv.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Is the Writing on the Wall for Ada?
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2003 13:07:56 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: PVV
Message-ID: 
 <slrnbno8pc.mc.randhol+valid_for_reply_from_news@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no>
References: <NGs6b.10770$Pa1.519789@read1.cgocable.net>
 <vhieky4922o.fsf@niu.ifi.uio.no> <ud6dolepw.fsf@nasa.gov>
 <1064527575.648809@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> <3F739C1D.4030907@attbi.com>
 <uoex8i8i9.fsf@earthlink.net> <na5fnvcqjdvjbutt1s7hu9mhqadjk4jemb@4ax.com>
 <3F78E850.8010401@comcast.net>
 <slrnbniahu.g9.randhol+valid_for_reply_from_news@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no>
 <3F797748.3000203@noplace.com> <834clb.uan1.ln@skymaster>
 <3F7AC5B0.9080108@noplace.com>
 <slrnbnnrde.248.randhol+valid_for_reply_from_news@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no>
 <3F7C1BE6.5060100@noplace.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no
X-Trace: tyfon.itea.ntnu.no 1065100076 12061 129.241.83.78 (2 Oct 2003
 13:07:56 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@itea.ntnu.no
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2003 13:07:56 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.0 (Linux)
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:116
Date: 2003-10-02T13:07:56+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 2003-10-02, Marin David Condic <nobody@noplace.com> wrote:
> Now that we have Ada-provided string tools, I don't waste my time with 
> that sort of thing.

Exactly! Bounded_Strings.

Preben
-- 
"... in Ada, you can never have a buffer overflow error. Unless of
course you go very far out of your way to specifically program one
[...] most Ada programmers would consider going out of your way to
construct an Ada program that had a potential buffer overflow not
as a challenge, but as a kind of pornography." - Robert I. Eachus